Wolfe v. State

585 So. 2d 506, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9651, 1991 WL 183834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wolfe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 So. 2d 915
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1991·No. No. 89-03128·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for two counts of attempted murder of a law enforcement officer and two counts of robbery. Regarding the robbery sentences, however, we strike the notation referring to section 775.0825, Florida Statutes (1987), as we did in Mr. Wolfe’s codefendant’s case, Hardage v. State, 581 So.2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Although section 775.0825 requires a defendant to serve no less than twenty-five years for attempted murder of a law enforcement officer, it does not apply to robbery. Eraeta v. State, 575 So.2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The notation does not otherwise affect the robbery sentences, which are concurrent to the other sentences.

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. State, 585 So. 2d 506, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9651, 1991 WL 183834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

585 So. 2d 506 (Wolfe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eraeta v. State
575 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hardage v. State
581 So. 2d 965 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)