Wolfe v. Knight

15 Misc. 438, 37 N.Y.S. 210, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 790
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 Misc. 438 (Wolfe v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolfe v. Knight, 15 Misc. 438, 37 N.Y.S. 210, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 790 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

The order of September 17, 1895, which purports to adjudge the judgment debtor guilty of misconduct constituting a civil contempt omitted to declare that it had been ascertained and determined that the misconduct complained of defeated, impaired, impeded or prejudiced the rights or remedies of the party to the proceeding, and because of this alone it was fatally defective ( Wolf v. Buttner, 6 Misc. Rep. 119 ; 26 N. Y. Supp. 25) and must be reversed.

It is not enough that property is found in the hands of the judgment debtor.

Besides, the proceedings appear to have been dismissed by an order of Justice Conlan and in proper form.

If there was any irregularity in the mode of dismissal, plaintiff could only take advantage of it by application to set it aside and revive the proceedings. Without such the court had no jurisdiction and could not punish the defendant.

Order is, therefore, reversed, vacated and set aside, with costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Cowan v. Hamil
145 N.Y.S. 400 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)
Ryan v. Ryan
73 A.D. 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Misc. 438, 37 N.Y.S. 210, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-knight-nynyccityct-1896.