Wolfe v. Howard Insurance

7 N.Y.3d 584
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1852·Published

Opinion

Jewett, J.

(after stating the facts.) — The measure of damages decided by the judge to be correct, was the same upon which the parties had agreed in their contract, and is plainly the true measure. If the plaintiff had been in debt for the purchase-money, to the full value of the goods, it might, upon the principle contended for here by the defendant, as well be contended that he was not entitled to recover anything. There is no error in the judgment, and it should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. Howard Insurance, 7 N.Y.3d 584 (N.Y. 1852).

7 N.Y.3d 584 (Wolfe v. Howard Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.