Wolfe v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Wolfe v. Hanson

958 So. 2d 1178, 2007 La. LEXIS 1426, 2007 WL 2076962

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wolfe v. Hanson. Read the opinion of the Court — 983 So. 2d 1292 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 15, 2007·No. No. 2007-CJ-0907·Published

Opinion

In re Wolfe, George William II; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 77,998; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2006 CU 1434.

Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. The case is remanded to the court of appeal, which is directed to order the trial court to provide explicit reasons for its decision not to designate a domiciliary parent pursuant to La. R.S. 9:335. The court of appeal shall then reconsider the matter in light of the trial court’s reasons.

JOHNSON, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wolfe, George William II; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 77,998; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2006 CU 1434.

Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside. The case is remanded to the court of appeal, which is directed to order the trial court to provide explicit reasons for its decision not to designate a domiciliary parent pursuant to La. R.S. 9:335. The court of appeal shall then reconsider the matter in light of the trial court’s reasons.

JOHNSON, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny.

Wolfe v. Hanson, 958 So. 2d 1178, 2007 La. LEXIS 1426, 2007 WL 2076962 (La. 2007).

Pincite

958 So. 2d 1178 (Wolfe v. Hanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.