Wolfe v. Graham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wolfe v. Graham

1937 OK 714, 74 P.2d 119, 181 Okla. 379, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 171

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 7, 1937

DocketNo. 27338.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1937 OK 714 (Wolfe v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfe v. Graham, 1937 OK 714, 74 P.2d 119, 181 Okla. 379, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 171 (Okla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Florence N. Graham et al. filed an action in the district court against O. Dale Wolfe et al., seeking a declaratory interest in real estate. From an adverse judgment, O. Dale Wolfe appeals. On August 6, .1936, Ruth Johnson filed a cross-petition in error, which petition was filed more than sis months after the final order of the trial court from which O. Dale Wolfe prosecutes appeal. We have held that such proceeding must be dismissed. In Haygood v. Pinker, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, and Bilby v. Bilby, 127 Okla. 9, 251 P. 611, we have held that a cross-petition in error must be filed within six months from the date of final judgment or this court will- not review the errors presented by such cross-appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Florence N. Graham et al. filed an action in the district court against O. Dale Wolfe et al., seeking a declaratory interest in real estate. From an adverse judgment, O. Dale Wolfe appeals. On August 6, .1936, Ruth Johnson filed a cross-petition in error, which petition was filed more than sis months after the final order of the trial court from which O. Dale Wolfe prosecutes appeal. We have held that such proceeding must be dismissed. In Haygood v. Pinker, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, and Bilby v. Bilby, 127 Okla. 9, 251 P. 611, we have held that a cross-petition in error must be filed within six months from the date of final judgment or this court will- not review the errors presented by such cross-appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1937 OK 714, 74 P.2d 119, 181 Okla. 379, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-graham-okla-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack