Wolfe v. Graham

1937 OK 714, 74 P.2d 119, 181 Okla. 379, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 171
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 7, 1937·No. No. 27338.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Florence N. Graham et al. filed an action in the district court against O. Dale Wolfe et al., seeking a declaratory interest in real estate. From an adverse judgment, O. Dale Wolfe appeals. On August 6, .1936, Ruth Johnson filed a cross-petition in error, which petition was filed more than sis months after the final order of the trial court from which O. Dale Wolfe prosecutes appeal. We have held that such proceeding must be dismissed. In Haygood v. Pinker, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, and Bilby v. Bilby, 127 Okla. 9, 251 P. 611, we have held that a cross-petition in error must be filed within six months from the date of final judgment or this court will- not review the errors presented by such cross-appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. Graham, 1937 OK 714, 74 P.2d 119, 181 Okla. 379, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 171 (Okla. 1937).

1937 OK 714 (Wolfe v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Of Washington, V. James Ples Herrick
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2023
Cutright v. Richey
1952 OK 201 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)