Wolfe v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad
This text of 36 N.E. 213 (Wolfe v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the conclusion of the evidence in this cause, the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the appellee, which was done.
The evidence is not in the record. We must presume in favor of the ruling of the circuit court, that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize a verdict for the appellant. If such was the character of the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. Dodge v. Gaylord, 53 Ind. 365; Vance v. Vance, 74 Ind. 370; Washer v. Allensville, etc., Turnpike Co., 81 Ind. 78; McClaren, Admr., v. Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., 83 Ind. 319; Purcell v. English, 86 Ind. 34.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 N.E. 213, 136 Ind. 383, 1894 Ind. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-evansville-terre-haute-railroad-ind-1894.