Wolfe v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad

36 N.E. 213, 136 Ind. 383, 1894 Ind. LEXIS 158
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 1894
DocketNo. 16,573
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 N.E. 213 (Wolfe v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolfe v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad, 36 N.E. 213, 136 Ind. 383, 1894 Ind. LEXIS 158 (Ind. 1894).

Opinion

Coffey, J.

At the conclusion of the evidence in this cause, the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the appellee, which was done.

The evidence is not in the record. We must presume in favor of the ruling of the circuit court, that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize a verdict for the appellant. If such was the character of the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. Dodge v. Gaylord, 53 Ind. 365; Vance v. Vance, 74 Ind. 370; Washer v. Allensville, etc., Turnpike Co., 81 Ind. 78; McClaren, Admr., v. Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., 83 Ind. 319; Purcell v. English, 86 Ind. 34.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Coca Cola Bottling Works
177 N.E.2d 759 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
Worster v. Caylor
110 N.E.2d 337 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
Weinstein v. State of Indiana
196 N.E. 221 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1935)
Jacobs v. Jolley
62 N.E. 1028 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.E. 213, 136 Ind. 383, 1894 Ind. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-evansville-terre-haute-railroad-ind-1894.