Wolfe v. Department of Health & Human Services

D.C. Circuit

Wolfe v. Department of Health & Human Services

821 F.2d 809, 261 U.S. App. D.C. 321, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17821

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 2, 1987·No. No. 86-5017·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment, the opinion of the Court and the dissenting opinion, all filed [322] on April 7, 1987, 815 F.2d 1527, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order of the court will govern further proceedings herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment, the opinion of the Court and the dissenting opinion, all filed [322] on April 7, 1987, 815 F.2d 1527, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order of the court will govern further proceedings herein.

Wolfe v. Department of Health & Human Services, 821 F.2d 809, 261 U.S. App. D.C. 321, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17821 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

821 F.2d 809 (Wolfe v. Department of Health & Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related