Wolfe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 170 F.2d 73 (Wolfe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frederick John WOLFE, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
William Galbally, Jr., of Los Angeles, Cal. (James O. Wynn and George G. Blattmachr, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, George A. Stinson, Morton K. Rothschild, and Hilbert P. Zarky, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and BONE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Tax Court (8 T.C. 689) is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 F.2d 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1948.