Wolfe v. Bristol-Meyers Co.
This text of 342 So. 2d 835 (Wolfe v. Bristol-Meyers Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal questions the correctness of a summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendant-appellee, in a wrongful death action arising out of an alleged breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
Upon careful consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and arguments of counsel, we have determined that the plaintiff-appellant has conclusively established that there are material issues of fact to be determined by the trier of fact, and that defendant-appellee was not entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. Francis v. General Motors Corporation, 287 So.2d 146 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
Therefore, the summary judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 So. 2d 835, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-bristol-meyers-co-fladistctapp-1977.