Wolfe, Pet v. Ross v. State Farm

125 A.3d 408, 633 Pa. 414, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2572, 2015 WL 6828692
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 4, 2015
Docket221 WAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 125 A.3d 408 (Wolfe, Pet v. Ross v. State Farm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolfe, Pet v. Ross v. State Farm, 125 A.3d 408, 633 Pa. 414, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2572, 2015 WL 6828692 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

0RDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether a clause in a homeowner’s insurance policy, excluding coverage for liability for bodily injury “arising out of the ownership, maintenance [or] use ... of a motor vehicle owned or operated by ... any insured” is ambiguous where the homeowner’s liability is based solely upon his negligence in supplying alcohol to an underage person, and no insured committed any tortious act related to any vehicle.
(2) Whether the independent concurrent cause rule should be adopted as the law of Pennsylvania.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Epps v. Farmers Ins. Exch.
434 P.3d 496 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2018)
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Moore
175 A.3d 999 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Herr-Voss Stamco, Inc. v. Bauer
130 A.3d 1285 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.3d 408, 633 Pa. 414, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2572, 2015 WL 6828692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-pet-v-ross-v-state-farm-pa-2015.