Wolfe, G & M, h/w Pets v. Reading Blue Mtn
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GARY D. WOLFE AND MARY O. WOLFE, : No. 586 MAL 2022 HUSBAND AND WIFE, :
:
Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court
v. :
: :
READING BLUE MOUNTAIN AND : NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, :
:
Respondents :
IN RE: CONDEMNATION OF LANDS OF : No. 587 MAL 2022 GARY D. WOLFE AND MARY O. WOLFE : POTTSVILLE PIKE, MUHLENBERG : TOWNSHIP : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court
PETITION OF: GARY D. WOLFE AND : MARY O. WOLFE, HUSBAND AND WIFE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the
remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by reversing the [trial court] where it held that the taking at issue was for a public purpose and based its decision on caselaw addressing the public use requirement for a condemnation under eminent domain powers created prior to the passage of the Property Rights Protection Act, 26 Pa. [C.S.] § 201, et seq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolfe, G & M, h/w Pets v. Reading Blue Mtn (Wolfe, G & M, h/w Pets v. Reading Blue Mtn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.