Wolf v. Wolf
This text of 1 Wright 243 (Wolf v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find it impossible to shake off the suspicion that the true state of this case is not disclosed to us. The conduct of the parties, the withdrawal of the answer, the matter-stated in it, the manner of the separation, and the subsequent acts 244] and declara-*tions, excite suspicion. It is incredible that the-relation of man and wife should have been broken up, for the only reason disclosed in evidence. There must be something kept back by collusion, or otherwise. In this state of the case, the plaintiff' may dismiss his bill, without prejudice, or continue it, as he shall be advised.
The cause was continued.
At May term, 1834, the cause was again brought to hearing,, and further evidence heard. A divorce was decreed, and the plaintiff ordered to pay two hundred and fifty dollars alimony.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 243, 1 Ohio Ch. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-v-wolf-ohio-1833.