Wolf v. State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 28, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00308·Unknown

Opinion

1 | |MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931 PIETER M. O’LEARY, Nevada Bar No. 15297 2| |LEO S. WOLPERT, Nevada Bar No. 12658 3 | |MCLETCHIE LAW 602 South 10" Street 4| |Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300 / Fax: (702) 425-8220 >| |Email: efile@nvlitigation.com 6 | | Counsel for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA g | |GREGORY WOLF, an individual, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00308-MMD-CSD 10 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 vs 12 STATE OF NEVADA, ex. rel. NEVADA ¢ 13|])DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 14 DANA MARKS, an individual; RUSSELLE 228 DONNELLY, an_ individual, WILLIAM 15||DONNELLY, an individual; MICHAEL MINEV, an individual, 2 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Gregory Wolf, and Defendants Dana Marks, Russelle Donnelly, and 19 | Michael Minev (collectively “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, having 20 agreed to the following and for good cause under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil |Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 22 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. 23 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of 24 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 25 | |disclosure may be warranted under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 26 | |The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 27) lor responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends to only the limited 28 | information or items that are entitled under law to treatment as confidential.

1 2. SCOPE. 2 All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery 3 | |requests, and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be 4 | {subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material’) shall be subject to this 5 | |stipulated protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. A copy of 6 | |this Order must be included with any subpoena to any third party. Any party, or any third 7 | |party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate documents as Confidential 8 | |but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good faith, determined that 9 | |the documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined below, and pursuant to the 10 | |procedure set forth below. 1 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 12 “Confidential Information” shall mean information meriting special protection g 13 | Junder the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, applicable case law, and any and all health 14 | |information, including but not limited to medical records, treatment, diagnoses, medication, i 15 | |health information, and mental health treatment information. Confidential Information does 16 | |not include information that (a) is in the public domain at the time of disclosure; (b) becomes 2 17 | |part of the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; (c) the Receiving Party 18 | |can show was in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of disclosure; or (d) the 19 | |Receiving Party lawfully receives from a Non-party later without restriction as to disclosure. 20 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS. 21 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, agents, and 22 | |attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, paralegals, and 23 | |support/ clerical staff). 24 Non-party: any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity 25 | jother than a party. 26 Protected Material: any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information 27 | |that is designated by a Party or Non-party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving Party 28 | |challenges the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is not

1 | Jentitled to protection as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court for an 2 | |order designating the material confidential within the time period specified below; or (c) the 3 | |Designating Party withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing. 4 Producing Party: a Party or Non-party that produces Discovery Material in this 5 | |action. 6 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 7 Designating Party: a Party or Non-party that designates Discovery Material as 8 | |“CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected 9 | |Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. 10 Challenging Party: a party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s 11 | |confidentiality designation. 12 Confidentiality Log: a Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of g 13 | |documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” that includes the Bates numbers of the 14 | |documents designated (or the portions thereof) as “Confidential” and the basis for doing so. 15 | |Each Producing Party shall keep this log cumulatively and re-produce it every time they 16 | |designate something as “CONFIDENTIAL” so that it is a cumulative record of what the 17 | |party has marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” 18 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. 19 Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or 20 | jaffixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere 21] |}with the legibility of the document, and which will permit complete removal of the 22 | |“Confidential” designation. A Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 23 | |Protected Material that includes the Bates numbers of the documents designated (or portions 24 | |thereof) as “CONFIDENTIAL” and the basis for doing so. Documents shall be designated 25 | |““Confidential” prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the 26 | |documents. The designation of documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be accompanied with 27 | ja Confidentiality Log in the form included at Exhibit A. 28 A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit

1 | |CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the 2 | |appropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate |for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that 4 | |qualify—so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for 5 | |}which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 6 | |If only a portion or portions of materials on a page or within a document merit protection, a 7 | |Producing Party must so indicate by making appropriate markings in the margins but not 8 | jover text. The accompanying log should clearly explain which portion is designated as 9 | |CONFIDENTIAL. 10 A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for 11] Jinspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 12 | |indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before g 13 | |the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed Bait 14 | |“Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and i 15 | |produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify |for protection under this Order, and, before producing the specified documents, the 2 |Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected 18 | |Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolf v. State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections, (D. Nev. 2023).

Wolf v. State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections (Wolf v. State of Nevada Ex Rel Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)