Wolf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wolf v. State

750 So. 2d 756, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 987, 2000 WL 126620

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 2000

DocketNo. 5D99-630

StatusPublished

This text of 750 So. 2d 756 (Wolf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf v. State, 750 So. 2d 756, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 987, 2000 WL 126620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Beate Roswitha Wolf was orally sentenced to time served for driving with a suspended license, but the written version of the sentence imposed a six month period of probation. Additionally, the written sentence varied from the oral sentence for other counts by imposing the burden of paying the costs of urinalysis, breathalyzer and/or blood tests, and any other tests ordered by a drug treatment center.

The state agrees that the written sentence for driving with a suspended license should be changed to conform to the sentence orally imposed at the sentencing hearing. The written sentence imposed for driving with a suspended license is vacated and we remand to the trial court for resentencing consistent with the oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing.

Finally, we find that appellant’s failure to timely object to the imposition of costs for testing procedures precludes our granting relief on that point. Smith v. State, 746 So.2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI