Wolf v. Parke

City of New York Municipal Court

Wolf v. Parke

11 Misc. 720, 32 N.Y.S. 1151, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 883

DecidedMarch 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Misc. 720 (Wolf v. Parke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf v. Parke, 11 Misc. 720, 32 N.Y.S. 1151, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The proofs show that the excise license which the receiver desired the defendant to-transfer was not owned by him, but by the Henry Elias Brewing Company, which corporation paid, the fee to obtain it and embraced it in a mortgage held by it.

The application below, therefore, wás properly denied, and the orderx appealed from must be affirmed,, with costs.

Newburger and Vah Wyck, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The proofs show that the excise license which the receiver desired the defendant to-transfer was not owned by him, but by the Henry Elias Brewing Company, which corporation paid, the fee to obtain it and embraced it in a mortgage held by it.

The application below, therefore, wás properly denied, and the orderx appealed from must be affirmed,, with costs.

Newburger and Vah Wyck, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Misc. 720, 32 N.Y.S. 1151, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-v-parke-nynyccityct-1895.