Wolf v. Long

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Wolf v. Long

468 A.2d 508, 321 Pa. Super. 338, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4399

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 25, 1983

DocketNo. 2735

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 468 A.2d 508 (Wolf v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf v. Long, 468 A.2d 508, 321 Pa. Super. 338, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4399 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The only questions before this court relate to possession of the premises located at 618 South 6th Street, Philadelphia. The only relief requested by appellant is the opening and/or striking of a confessed judgment in ejectment. It is evident from the briefs of both parties and after oral argument that appellants, after residing on the premises for the entire term of the lease, have left the premises during the pendency of this appeal. This court finds the question of possession to have been resolved and that a review of the propriety of the proceedings before the Honorable Juanita Kidd Stout would be purely an academic exercise. This appeal is dismissed as moot. See American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zion, 319 Pa.Super. 547, 466 A.2d 679 (1983).

POPOVICH, J., files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The only questions before this court relate to possession of the premises located at 618 South 6th Street, Philadelphia. The only relief requested by appellant is the opening and/or striking of a confessed judgment in ejectment. It is evident from the briefs of both parties and after oral argument that appellants, after residing on the premises for the entire term of the lease, have left the premises during the pendency of this appeal. This court finds the question of possession to have been resolved and that a review of the propriety of the proceedings before the Honorable Juanita Kidd Stout would be purely an academic exercise. This appeal is dismissed as moot. See American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zion, 319 Pa.Super. 547, 466 A.2d 679 (1983).

POPOVICH, J., files a dissenting statement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 A.2d 508, 321 Pa. Super. 338, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-v-long-pasuperct-1983.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack