Wolf v. Long

468 A.2d 508, 321 Pa. Super. 338, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4399
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 25, 1983·No. No. 2735·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The only questions before this court relate to possession of the premises located at 618 South 6th Street, Philadelphia. The only relief requested by appellant is the opening and/or striking of a confessed judgment in ejectment. It is evident from the briefs of both parties and after oral argument that appellants, after residing on the premises for the entire term of the lease, have left the premises during the pendency of this appeal. This court finds the question of possession to have been resolved and that a review of the propriety of the proceedings before the Honorable Juanita Kidd Stout would be purely an academic exercise. This appeal is dismissed as moot. See American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zion, 319 Pa.Super. 547, 466 A.2d 679 (1983).

POPOVICH, J., files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolf v. Long, 468 A.2d 508, 321 Pa. Super. 338, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4399 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

468 A.2d 508 (Wolf v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Bank v. Bazirganian, N.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Jayaram, P. v. Wang, C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Joe Buck Properties v. Rocco, R.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Deutsche National Trust Co. v. Meister, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015