Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

787 N.W.2d 575, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 532, 2010 WL 3431871

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 26, 2010·No. A10-809·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 787 N.W.2d 575, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 532, 2010 WL 3431871 (Mich. 2010).

Pincite

787 N.W.2d 575 (Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related