Wolf v. Bauer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Wolf v. Bauer

7 N.J. Misc. 911

DecidedOctober 21, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.J. Misc. 911 (Wolf v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf v. Bauer, 7 N.J. Misc. 911 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiff has a verdict for $7,500 for personal injuries which we are asked to set aside because it is urged that it is against the weight of the evidence and because it is excessive. It is not against the weight of the evidence. While plaintiff sustained painful and severe injuries we are satisfied that the verdict is excessive.

If she will consent to a reduction of the verdict to $5,000 the rule ¿will be discharged, otherwise it will be made absolute and a venire de novo awarded upon the question of damages only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiff has a verdict for $7,500 for personal injuries which we are asked to set aside because it is urged that it is against the weight of the evidence and because it is excessive. It is not against the weight of the evidence. While plaintiff sustained painful and severe injuries we are satisfied that the verdict is excessive.

If she will consent to a reduction of the verdict to $5,000 the rule ¿will be discharged, otherwise it will be made absolute and a venire de novo awarded upon the question of damages only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.J. Misc. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-v-bauer-nj-1929.