Wolf v. Augustine
This text of 37 A. 574 (Wolf v. Augustine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is very clear that where the submission makes no provision [582]*582for filling vacancies in tbe board of arbitration, tbe occurrence of a vacancy by death or otherwise revokes the submission. In such circumstances the court possesses no power to compel the parties to select other arbitrators. The submission necessarily fails. The learned court below was certainly right in making absolute the rule to show cause why the rule to arbitrate should not be discharged and the proceedings thereunder dismissed, and the reasons for their action are very well set forth in the opinion filed, which we fully approve.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A. 574, 181 Pa. 576, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-v-augustine-pa-1897.