Wolf v. Augustine

37 A. 574, 181 Pa. 576, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 583
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 2, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 526·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pub. Curiam,

It is very clear that where the submission makes no provision [582] for filling vacancies in tbe board of arbitration, tbe occurrence of a vacancy by death or otherwise revokes the submission. In such circumstances the court possesses no power to compel the parties to select other arbitrators. The submission necessarily fails. The learned court below was certainly right in making absolute the rule to show cause why the rule to arbitrate should not be discharged and the proceedings thereunder dismissed, and the reasons for their action are very well set forth in the opinion filed, which we fully approve.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolf v. Augustine, 37 A. 574, 181 Pa. 576, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 583 (Pa. 1897).

37 A. 574 (Wolf v. Augustine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. M. Davis Co. v. Shaler Township
2 A.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Otoe County Nat. Bank v. Delany
88 F.2d 238 (Eighth Circuit, 1937)
Backus-Brooks Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
21 F.2d 4 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Holscher v. Ingalls Stone Co.
66 Pa. Super. 76 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Johnson v. Crawford
61 A. 1103 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)