Wolf, T., Pets. v. General Assembly of PA
This text of Wolf, T., Pets. v. General Assembly of PA (Wolf, T., Pets. v. General Assembly of PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
TOM WOLF, GOVERNOR OF THE : No. 73 MM 2022 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : AND LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ACTING : SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH : OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2022, the Application for Leave to File
Reply to Respondent’s Answer is GRANTED.
The Application of CHILD USA to File Amicus Brief, the Motion for Leave to File
Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Marci A. Hamilton, the Motion for Leave to File Brief of
Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania Family Institute, the Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus
Curiae Pro-Life Union of Greater Philadelphia, and the Application for Leave to File Brief
of Amici Curiae Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees, Council 13, SEIU Pennsylvania Joint Council, and UFCW Local
1776 Keystone State are GRANTED. The “Application for Invocation of King’s Bench Power to Declare Senate Bill 106
of 2021 Invalid and Enjoin Further Action on Constitutional Amendments” is DENIED,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE to seek similar relief in the Commonwealth Court’s original
jurisdiction.
The Application for Leave to Intervene by the League of Women Voters of
Pennsylvania, Sajda Adam, and Simone Roberts is DISMISSED.
[73 MM 2022] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wolf, T., Pets. v. General Assembly of PA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-t-pets-v-general-assembly-of-pa-pa-2022.