Wolf Maize Hills v. Stevenson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Wolf Maize Hills v. Stevenson

62 Ill. App. 292

DecidedJanuary 22, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ill. App. 292 (Wolf Maize Hills v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf Maize Hills v. Stevenson, 62 Ill. App. 292 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The suit is to recover, not for work done, but for a breach of contract.

Appellant admits that it endeavored to induce appellee to work the balance of the year for $10 per week, as the mill was not running, but denies that it discharged him.

We think, under the conflicting evidence, that the jury were warranted in finding the issue for appellee.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI