Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC

DecidedJuly 2, 2015

Docket14-09-00118-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC (Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

July 2, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals WOLF HOLLOW I, L.P., Appellant

NO. 14-09-00118-CV V.

EL PASO MARKETING, L.P. AND ENTERPRISE TEXAS PIPELINE, LLC, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed December 30, 2008, in favor of appellees, El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the trial court erred by issuing the third and fourth declarations of its final judgment (i.e., declaring that “Wolf Hollow’s exclusive remedy regarding gas quality claims for gas delivered by Enterprise Texas Pipeline is to receive an assignment as set forth in Article XIV, Section 14.1 of any claims that El Paso Marketing, L.P. may have against such transporter” and declaring that “Article XXI of the Agreement does not apply to gas quality claims for gas delivered to Wolf Hollow on the Enterprise Texas Pipeline . . . .”). We order these portions of the judgment VACATED in accordance with this court’s opinion.

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

July 2, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals WOLF HOLLOW I, L.P., Appellant

NO. 14-09-00118-CV V.

EL PASO MARKETING, L.P. AND ENTERPRISE TEXAS PIPELINE, LLC, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed December 30, 2008, in favor of appellees, El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the trial court erred by issuing the third and fourth declarations of its final judgment (i.e., declaring that “Wolf Hollow’s exclusive remedy regarding gas quality claims for gas delivered by Enterprise Texas Pipeline is to receive an assignment as set forth in Article XIV, Section 14.1 of any claims that El Paso Marketing, L.P. may have against such transporter” and declaring that “Article XXI of the Agreement does not apply to gas quality claims for gas delivered to Wolf Hollow on the Enterprise Texas Pipeline . . . .”). We order these portions of the judgment VACATED in accordance with this court’s opinion.

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P. and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolf-hollow-i-lp-v-el-paso-marketing-lp-and-enterp-texapp-2015.