Wole v. Hitchcock
This text of 18 App. D.C. 515 (Wole v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
• This application for the allowance of a special appeal from the order,of the court below refusing to grant a preliminary injunction or restraining order, upon the allegations of the bill, has been very fully argued by counsel for the respective parties, and we have duly considered the application.. The conclusion to which we have arrived from the argument is, that the case is not such as will justify the special appeal prayed, but the case should be disposed of by a final decree, from which an appeal may be taken in regular course, and from the decree of this court an appeal may be taken to the Supreme Court of the Hnited States. The great object of [516]*516obtaining a preliminary injunction is to prevent immediate action by the executive department, but we suppose that such reasonable delay may be obtained as will enable the complainants to avail themselves of the right of appeal from a final decree that may be passed in the case. In refusing this appeal we intimate no opinion as to the final decree that may be made by the court below. United States Elect. Lighting Co. v. Ross, 9 App. D. C. 558. Application refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 App. D.C. 515, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 5083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wole-v-hitchcock-cadc-1901.