Woldseth v. State

261 So. 3d 660
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D16-2354
StatusPublished

This text of 261 So. 3d 660 (Woldseth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woldseth v. State, 261 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

James Woldseth appeals his amended sentences after the postconviction court granted his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, vacating one of his convictions and resentencing him on his remaining offenses. We affirm Woldseth's amended sentences and restitution order of $823,233.88 to the victim. However, on appeal he argues that the trial court erroneously imposed costs and fees when it resentenced Woldseth on May 10, 2017. We agree. Because costs and fees were orally waived at the resentencing hearing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the award of court costs and fees.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

KELLY, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 So. 3d 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woldseth-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.