Wolcott v. Shaw

10 Del. 25

Opinion

By the Court:

The first adjournment was on the application of the defendant, and although it was not stated that the second adjournment was on account of the absence then of the plaintiff, it was but reasonable to presume that it was done by the justice of his own motion for that reason, and to afford a fair opportunity for the trial of the case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.