Wolcott v. Shaw
10 Del. 25
This text of 10 Del. 25 (Wolcott v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wolcott v. Shaw, 10 Del. 25 (Del. Ct. App. 1875).
Opinion
The first adjournment was on the application of the defendant, and although it was not stated that the second adjournment was on account of the absence then of the plaintiff, it was but reasonable to presume that it was done by the justice of his own motion for that reason, and to afford a fair opportunity for the trial of the case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Del. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolcott-v-shaw-delsuperct-1875.