Wolcott v. Fellows

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Wolcott v. Fellows

131 A. 353, 82 N.H. 556, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 27

DecidedDecember 3, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A. 353 (Wolcott v. Fellows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolcott v. Fellows, 131 A. 353, 82 N.H. 556, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 27 (N.H. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the evidence it was for the jury to say whether Stroth wás driving the car at the time of the collision as Fellows’ *557 agent or as a bailee. The arrangement between them was one of agency if it was for Stroth to endeavor to sell a car for Fellows, and one of bailment if Stroth’s undertaking to sell was only his own, and not Fellows’, affair. There being evidence of Stroth’s negligence, the order is

Exception sustained.

Snow, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon the evidence it was for the jury to say whether Stroth wás driving the car at the time of the collision as Fellows’ *557 agent or as a bailee. The arrangement between them was one of agency if it was for Stroth to endeavor to sell a car for Fellows, and one of bailment if Stroth’s undertaking to sell was only his own, and not Fellows’, affair. There being evidence of Stroth’s negligence, the order is

Exception sustained.

Snow, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A. 353, 82 N.H. 556, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolcott-v-fellows-nh-1925.