Wojenski v. Prankard

New York Court of Appeals

Wojenski v. Prankard

164 N.E. 581, 249 N.Y. 555, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 899

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Held, that upon the record before us there was an issue of fact (1) as to whether the deceased was invited by the defendant to accompany him in the boat described in the evidence; (2) as to whether the defendant was guilty of negligence, and (3) as to whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Held, that upon the record before us there was an issue of fact (1) as to whether the deceased was invited by the defendant to accompany him in the boat described in the evidence; (2) as to whether the defendant was guilty of negligence, and (3) as to whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Wojenski v. Prankard, 164 N.E. 581, 249 N.Y. 555, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 899 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

164 N.E. 581 (Wojenski v. Prankard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.