Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia

53 F.3d 330, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16685

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 1995

Docket94-1719

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 330 (Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 53 F.3d 330, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16685 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

53 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William T. WOHLFORD; Mary Clare D. Wohlford, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Virginia Department of Health;
Dwain H. Mays; Malcolm Tenney, Jr., M.D.; Bruce Hicks;
Robert J. Schutrumpf; Donald Stern, M.D., M.P.H.; C.M.G.
Buttery, M.D., Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-1719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.

William T. Wohlford, Mary Clare D. Wohlford, Appellants Pro Se. Karen Lynn Lebo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-88-112-A (W.D.Va. May 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William T. WOHLFORD; Mary Clare D. Wohlford, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Virginia Department of Health;
Dwain H. Mays; Malcolm Tenney, Jr., M.D.; Bruce Hicks;
Robert J. Schutrumpf; Donald Stern, M.D., M.P.H.; C.M.G.
Buttery, M.D., Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-1719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.

William T. Wohlford, Mary Clare D. Wohlford, Appellants Pro Se. Karen Lynn Lebo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wohlford v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-88-112-A (W.D.Va. May 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F.3d 330, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wohlford-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-ca4-1995.