Wohlberg v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance

209 Ill. App. 176
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 21, 1917
DocketGen. No. 22,932
StatusPublished

This text of 209 Ill. App. 176 (Wohlberg v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wohlberg v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance, 209 Ill. App. 176 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 367*—When question not made an issue is not revievoable. The question of breach of warranty as to statements in an insured’s application for insurance not made an issue by the pleadings, was not reviewable, even though instructions were given thereon at defendant’s request and even though plaintiff urged that the alleged warranties must be taken as representations, in an action to recover on the policy. 3. Evidence, § 165*—What constitute self-serving statements by an insured. The admission to rebut defendant’s evidence as to plaintiff’s state of health at the time of delivery to him of an insurance policy sued on, of copies of his applications for insurance in other companies prior to his application for the policy sued on, and of the medical examiner’s reports accompanying same, was prejudicial error, as such were self-serving statements and inadmissible, in an action to recover on the policy under an issue as to the applicant’s prior state of health.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wohlberg-v-merchants-reserve-life-insurance-illappct-1917.