Wohl v. Swinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Wohl v. Swinney

867 N.E.2d 842, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1407

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 2007

Docket2007-0593

StatusPublished

This text of 867 N.E.2d 842 (Wohl v. Swinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wohl v. Swinney, 867 N.E.2d 842, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2006-05-123, 2007-Ohio-592. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed March 22, 2007:

“Whether the definition of ’insured’ as ’any other person occupying your covered auto who is not a named insured or insured family member for uninsured motorist’s coverage under another policy’ is ambiguous and should be construed against the insurer to provide coverage for a permissive operator of a covered vehicle who is not a named insured or insured family member.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Safeco Ins. v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 86124, 2006-Ohio-2063.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler App. No. CA2006-05-123, 2007-Ohio-592. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed March 22, 2007:

“Whether the definition of ’insured’ as ’any other person occupying your covered auto who is not a named insured or insured family member for uninsured motorist’s coverage under another policy’ is ambiguous and should be construed against the insurer to provide coverage for a permissive operator of a covered vehicle who is not a named insured or insured family member.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Safeco Ins. v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 86124, 2006-Ohio-2063.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 N.E.2d 842, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wohl-v-swinney-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack