Wofford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wofford v. State

613 So. 2d 542, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1583, 1993 WL 16413

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1353

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 542 (Wofford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wofford v. State, 613 So. 2d 542, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1583, 1993 WL 16413 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence is amended to correct a scrivener’s error which reflected appellant was entitled to 142 days’ credit for time served, rather than the 162 days calculated and announced at his sentencing. See Hall v. State, 579 So.2d 913 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). As amended, appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence is amended to correct a scrivener’s error which reflected appellant was entitled to 142 days’ credit for time served, rather than the 162 days calculated and announced at his sentencing. See Hall v. State, 579 So.2d 913 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). As amended, appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 542, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1583, 1993 WL 16413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wofford-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack