IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION
CHAD R. WOFFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 320-021 ) WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS; DEPUTY ) WARDEN BEASLEY; DEPUTY WARDEN ) McCLOUD; DEPUTY WARDEN KEITH; ) CAPTAIN THOMAS; DEPUTY SPIRES; ) NURSE MURRY; MRS. FISH; DEPUTY ) WARDEN WICKER; LIEUTENANT ) SYATHS; MRS. WILCOX; MRS. RICKS; ) MRS. STEWART; MRS. CLARK; TELFAIR ) STATE PRISON; OFFICER D. SMITH; ) MAIL SUPERVISOR UNKNOWN; ) MR. LYNN; and MRS. WHITT, ) ) Defendants. ) _________
O R D E R _________ Plaintiff, incarcerated at Telfair State Prison in Helena, Georgia, was one of three prisoners who attempted to join in bringing one lawsuit against the above-named Defendants. See Coleman v. Brooks, CV 320-014 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2020). United States District Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., dismissed that improperly filed lawsuit without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to file three separate lawsuits and directed Plaintiff Wofford must submit his own motion to proceed in forma pauperis within fourteen days of the Clerk opening a new lawsuit in his name. Id., doc. no. 6. When Plaintiff failed to respond, the Court recommended dismissing the case. (See doc. no. 3.) Moved to action by the recommendation for dismissal, Plaintiff belatedly submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, although not on the standard federal form, and a request for subpoenas. (Doc. no. 5). Although the Court does not condone Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to Judge Bowen’s
Order and comply with Local Rule 4.1, in an abundance of caution, the Court VACATES its April 13, 2020 recommendation for dismissal. (Doc. no. 3.) I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. After reviewing Plaintiff’s filing, it appears that he lacks sufficient resources to prepay the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 5-1), subject to compliance with the conditions of this Order.
Plaintiff is hereby advised that under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, all prisoners, even those who are allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, must pay the filing fee of $350.00 in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff must also pay the full appellate court filing fee if a Notice of Appeal is filed. Prisoner litigants allowed to proceed in forma pauperis must pay an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent (20%) of the greater of the average monthly deposits to, or the average monthly balance in, the prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
complaint. Prison officials are then required to collect the balance of the filing fee by deducting twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). This payment shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court “each time the amount in the plaintiff’s account exceeds $10 until the full filing fees are paid.” Id. The entire filing fee must be paid even if this suit is dismissed at the outset because it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In addition to requiring payment of the full filing fee, the Act requires prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies prior to filing a federal lawsuit which challenges “prison
conditions.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; see also 18 U.S.C. § 3626(g)(2). All prisoner civil rights actions are subject to dismissal if the prisoner has not exhausted the available administrative remedies with respect to each claim asserted. Moreover, even if the complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust, the prisoner will still be responsible for payment of the full filing fee. The law also provides that a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if the prisoner has on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, brought a civil action or appeal in federal court that was
dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The only exception to this “three strikes” rule is if the prisoner is in “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Because of these requirements in the law, the Court will give Plaintiff an opportunity, at this time, to voluntarily dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Such a voluntary dismissal will not require Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or count as a dismissal which may later subject him to the three-dismissal rule under section 1915(g). Plaintiff may
dismiss his case at this time by filing a notice of dismissal. However, should Plaintiff choose to proceed with his case, he MUST comply with the following instructions: (1) Plaintiff must furnish the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement to the trust (financial) officer of each prison where he has been confined for the past six months. The trust officer will complete and sign the form and return the form and supporting documents to Plaintiff for submission to the Court. Two copies of the form are enclosed for this purpose.1 (2) Plaintiff must sign and date the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees from
Trust Account. By signing this form, Plaintiff gives his consent to the collection of the entire filing fee from his prison account in installments, in accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (3) Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within thirty days of this Order. Once Plaintiff has returned the required forms, the Court will review Plaintiff’s
complaint, to be amended as described below, to determine which, if any, claims are viable and which, if any, Defendants should be served with a copy of the complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that while this action is pending, he shall immediately inform this Court of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case, without prejudice. II. Plaintiff Must Submit an Amended Complaint on the Standard Form Used by Incarcerated Litigants
As explained above, Plaintiff was one of three prisoners who attempted to join in bringing one lawsuit against the above-named Defendants. See Coleman v. Brooks, CV 320- 014 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2020). Although Plaintiff affixed his signature to a complaint
1The Court is aware Plaintiff has submitted some financial information in conjunction with his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (See doc. no. 6.) However, Plaintiff must follow the instructions set forth in this Order regarding the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement so the trust officer can provide the Court with the current information needed to determine the amount of any appropriate initial filing fee. prepared by a different inmate, the complaint does not detail claims related to alleged harm specific to Plaintiff Wofford. Nor was the complaint used to open this case the standard complaint form used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, and
therefore does not provided the information relevant to Plaintiff that the Southern District requires.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
DUBLIN DIVISION
CHAD R. WOFFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 320-021 ) WARDEN NATHAN BROOKS; DEPUTY ) WARDEN BEASLEY; DEPUTY WARDEN ) McCLOUD; DEPUTY WARDEN KEITH; ) CAPTAIN THOMAS; DEPUTY SPIRES; ) NURSE MURRY; MRS. FISH; DEPUTY ) WARDEN WICKER; LIEUTENANT ) SYATHS; MRS. WILCOX; MRS. RICKS; ) MRS. STEWART; MRS. CLARK; TELFAIR ) STATE PRISON; OFFICER D. SMITH; ) MAIL SUPERVISOR UNKNOWN; ) MR. LYNN; and MRS. WHITT, ) ) Defendants. ) _________
O R D E R _________ Plaintiff, incarcerated at Telfair State Prison in Helena, Georgia, was one of three prisoners who attempted to join in bringing one lawsuit against the above-named Defendants. See Coleman v. Brooks, CV 320-014 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2020). United States District Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., dismissed that improperly filed lawsuit without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to file three separate lawsuits and directed Plaintiff Wofford must submit his own motion to proceed in forma pauperis within fourteen days of the Clerk opening a new lawsuit in his name. Id., doc. no. 6. When Plaintiff failed to respond, the Court recommended dismissing the case. (See doc. no. 3.) Moved to action by the recommendation for dismissal, Plaintiff belatedly submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, although not on the standard federal form, and a request for subpoenas. (Doc. no. 5). Although the Court does not condone Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to Judge Bowen’s
Order and comply with Local Rule 4.1, in an abundance of caution, the Court VACATES its April 13, 2020 recommendation for dismissal. (Doc. no. 3.) I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. After reviewing Plaintiff’s filing, it appears that he lacks sufficient resources to prepay the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 5-1), subject to compliance with the conditions of this Order.
Plaintiff is hereby advised that under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, all prisoners, even those who are allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, must pay the filing fee of $350.00 in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff must also pay the full appellate court filing fee if a Notice of Appeal is filed. Prisoner litigants allowed to proceed in forma pauperis must pay an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent (20%) of the greater of the average monthly deposits to, or the average monthly balance in, the prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
complaint. Prison officials are then required to collect the balance of the filing fee by deducting twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). This payment shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court “each time the amount in the plaintiff’s account exceeds $10 until the full filing fees are paid.” Id. The entire filing fee must be paid even if this suit is dismissed at the outset because it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In addition to requiring payment of the full filing fee, the Act requires prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies prior to filing a federal lawsuit which challenges “prison
conditions.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; see also 18 U.S.C. § 3626(g)(2). All prisoner civil rights actions are subject to dismissal if the prisoner has not exhausted the available administrative remedies with respect to each claim asserted. Moreover, even if the complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust, the prisoner will still be responsible for payment of the full filing fee. The law also provides that a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if the prisoner has on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, brought a civil action or appeal in federal court that was
dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The only exception to this “three strikes” rule is if the prisoner is in “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Because of these requirements in the law, the Court will give Plaintiff an opportunity, at this time, to voluntarily dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Such a voluntary dismissal will not require Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or count as a dismissal which may later subject him to the three-dismissal rule under section 1915(g). Plaintiff may
dismiss his case at this time by filing a notice of dismissal. However, should Plaintiff choose to proceed with his case, he MUST comply with the following instructions: (1) Plaintiff must furnish the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement to the trust (financial) officer of each prison where he has been confined for the past six months. The trust officer will complete and sign the form and return the form and supporting documents to Plaintiff for submission to the Court. Two copies of the form are enclosed for this purpose.1 (2) Plaintiff must sign and date the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees from
Trust Account. By signing this form, Plaintiff gives his consent to the collection of the entire filing fee from his prison account in installments, in accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (3) Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within thirty days of this Order. Once Plaintiff has returned the required forms, the Court will review Plaintiff’s
complaint, to be amended as described below, to determine which, if any, claims are viable and which, if any, Defendants should be served with a copy of the complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that while this action is pending, he shall immediately inform this Court of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case, without prejudice. II. Plaintiff Must Submit an Amended Complaint on the Standard Form Used by Incarcerated Litigants
As explained above, Plaintiff was one of three prisoners who attempted to join in bringing one lawsuit against the above-named Defendants. See Coleman v. Brooks, CV 320- 014 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 10, 2020). Although Plaintiff affixed his signature to a complaint
1The Court is aware Plaintiff has submitted some financial information in conjunction with his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (See doc. no. 6.) However, Plaintiff must follow the instructions set forth in this Order regarding the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement so the trust officer can provide the Court with the current information needed to determine the amount of any appropriate initial filing fee. prepared by a different inmate, the complaint does not detail claims related to alleged harm specific to Plaintiff Wofford. Nor was the complaint used to open this case the standard complaint form used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, and
therefore does not provided the information relevant to Plaintiff that the Southern District requires. Therefore, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he MUST, within thirty days of the date of this Order, file a complete amended complaint on the standard complaint form used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, and include all matters he wishes the Court to consider in that one document. The Court DIRECTS the CLERK to attach a standard form complaint used by incarcerated litigants in the Southern District of Georgia, stamped with this case number, to
Plaintiff’s service copy of this Order. The Statement of Claim must not exceed six handwritten pages attached to the standard form. See Goodison v. Washington Mut. Bank, 232 F. App’x 922, 923 (11th Cir. 2007) (affirming the dismissal of a case where the plaintiff failed to heed the pleading instructions from the court regarding re-drafting the complaint); see also London v. Georgia Dep’t of Corr., CV 502-107, doc. no. 10 (M.D. Ga. May 10, 2002) (directing that amended complaint shall not exceed six handwritten pages). The amended complaint must be printed legibly so that the Court may discern
Plaintiff’s claims, and it will supersede and replace in its entirety the previous pleadings filed by Plaintiff. Hoefling v. City of Miami, 811 F.3d 1271, 1277 (11th Cir. 2016); Lowery v. Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1219 (11th Cir. 2007) (“an amended complaint supersedes the initial complaint and becomes the operative pleading in the case”). It must contain a caption that clearly identifies, by name, each individual that Plaintiff is suing in the present lawsuit. Furthermore, the body of Plaintiff’s amended complaint must contain sequentially numbered paragraphs containing only one act of misconduct per paragraph. The numbered paragraphs in his amended complaint should include information such as: (i) the alleged act of misconduct; (ii) the date on which such misconduct occurred; (iii) the names of
each and every individual who participated in such misconduct; and (iv) where appropriate, the location where the alleged misconduct occurred. While Plaintiff may attach exhibits to his amended complaint, he shall not incorporate them by reference as a means of providing the factual basis for his complaint. For example, Plaintiff should not simply state, “See attached documents.” Thus, Plaintiff must name the individuals whom he seeks to include as Defendants herein in both the caption and the body of his amended complaint; he may not rely on the fact that individuals are named in the
exhibits attached to his amended complaint as a means of including such persons as defendants to this lawsuit. The Court will not independently examine exhibits that Plaintiff does not specifically reference (by the exhibit’s page number) in his amended complaint. Plaintiff is further cautioned that no portion of any prior pleading shall be incorporated into his amended complaint by reference. Moreover, Plaintiff shall submit only one amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this Order. Therefore, within thirty days of the undersigned date, Plaintiff shall state in the single amended complaint filed in
accordance with the terms of this Order all claims specific to him that he wishes the Court to consider as a basis for awarding the relief sought. III. Motion for Subpoenas Plaintiff also asks for the issuance of subpoenas to prison officials requiring their appearance before the Court. Pursuant to a standing Order in the Southern District of Georgia, “[s]ubpoenas will not be issued to any party litigant who is incarcerated in a jail or prison. In such cases, arrangements will be made for the attendance of necessary witnesses and the production of necessary documents through other means.” In re Subpoenas, MC 496-006 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 16, 1996). Plaintiff is not entitled to have subpoenas issued to him, and the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. (Doc. no. 5-2.) Moreover, at this early stage of the case, there is no need for the production of witnesses and no need to make arrangements for any such appearances before the Court. IV. Conclusion If Plaintiff fails to respond to this Order with the above-described in forma pauperis papers and amended complaint within thirty days, the Court will presume that Plaintiff desires to have this case voluntarily dismissed and will dismiss this action, without prejudice. For the reasons explained above, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis subject to compliance with the terms of this Order, (doc. no. 5-1), and DENIES the motion for subpoenas, (doc. no. 5-2). SO ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2020, at Augusta, Georgia. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA