Wofford Oil Co. v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wofford Oil Co. v. Dunn

155 S.E. 383, 42 Ga. App. 215, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 293

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 8, 1930

Docket20680

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 383 (Wofford Oil Co. v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wofford Oil Co. v. Dunn, 155 S.E. 383, 42 Ga. App. 215, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The first two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are not complete and understandable within themselves, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, can not be considered.

2. In the light of all the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of an excerpt from the charge and of the failure of the court to give certain instructions to the jury, show no reversible error.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Luhe, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI