Wofford, Ex Parte Michael Wayne
This text of Wofford, Ex Parte Michael Wayne (Wofford, Ex Parte Michael Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-75,095
Ex parte MICHAEL WAYNE WOFFORD, Applicant
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Keller, P.J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court.
Applicant was convicted of sexual assault. He later filed a post-conviction motion for DNA testing under Chapter 64, (1) and because he was indigent, counsel was appointed in accordance with the terms of the statute. (2) The trial court denied the motion. Counsel filed a notice of appeal, but the notice was filed late, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Applicant then filed a habeas corpus application, alleging that he was denied his right to appeal and that counsel's failure to timely file the notice of appeal constituted ineffective assistance, entitling applicant to relief in the form of an out-of-time appeal.
We held in Ex parte Baker, 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 302 (February 8, 2006), that complaints arising out of Chapter 64 proceedings are not cognizable in post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. The application is therefore dismissed.
Keller, Presiding Judge
Date delivered: March 8, 2006
Do not publish
1. Tex. Code Crim. Proc., Art. 64.01, et. seq.
2. Art. 64.01(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wofford, Ex Parte Michael Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wofford-ex-parte-michael-wayne-texcrimapp-2006.