Wofford (Amber) Vs. Warden
This text of Wofford (Amber) Vs. Warden (Wofford (Amber) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMBER MICHEL WOFFORD, No. 76133 Appellant, vs. DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN, FLORENCE MCCLURE WOMEN'S FILED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; AND JAMES DZURENDA, DIRECTOR, JUL 2 4 2099 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ELIZABETA A. 15ROIAN CLERK OF SUCTEME COURT CORRECTIONS, Res • ondents.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is an appeal from a district court order denying a post- conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge. Having considered the parties arguments and the record, we are not persuaded that our decision in Winkle v. Foster, 127 Nev. 488, 269 P.3d 898 (2011), warrants revisiting. Thus, based on Winkle, respondents correctly denied appellant's request to be placed in residential confinement because she was not within one year of parole eligibility. Id. at 493, 269 P.3d at 901. The district court, therefore, correctly denied appellant's writ petition wherein she sought an order directing such placement. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Parraguirre SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Las Vegas Defense Group, LLC Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 1,0) I947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wofford (Amber) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wofford-amber-vs-warden-nev-2019.