Woerz v. . Rosenfeld

134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 625, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1213

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woerz v. . Rosenfeld, 134 N.E. 598, 232 N.Y. 625, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1213 (N.Y. 1922).

Pincite

134 N.E. 598 (Woerz v. . Rosenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.