Woert v. Jenkins
14 Johns. 352
Opinion
This was an action of trespass for maliciously and cruelly whipping the plaintiff’s mare to death. The plaintiff proved the facts charged in the declaration, and with circumstances of great barbarity on the part of the plaintiff. We think the charge of the judge was correct; and we should have been better satisfied with the verdict, if the amount of damages had been greater and more exemplary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woert v. Jenkins, 14 Johns. 352 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).
14 Johns. 352 (Woert v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pickle v. Page
225 A.D. 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Pegram v. Stortz
6 S.E. 485 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1888)
Byram v. McGuire
40 Tenn. 530 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1859)
Roberts v. Heim
27 Ala. 678 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1855)
Taylor v. . Church
8 N.Y. 452 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Uriah A. Boyden, in Error v. Edmund Burke
55 U.S. 575 (Supreme Court, 1853)
Anthony v. Gilbert
4 Blackf. 348 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1837)
M'Bride v. M'Laughlin
5 Watts 375 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)
Duncan v. . Stalcup
18 N.C. 440 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1836)