Woerner v. Bennett
This text of Woerner v. Bennett (Woerner v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LAW L|BRAFRY
NO. 30625
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAl¢» §§
‘ §
G’?
ANDREW D. WOERNER, Petitioner, @Q
vs . §§
MARK J. BENNETT, Attorney General, State of H` aii, an
¥Q
LINDA LINGLE, sovern@r, state of Hawai‘i,-`
COLLEEN HANABUSA, President of the Senate; CALVlN K. Y. SAY, Speaker of the House; BRIAN T. TANlGUCHI, Chair of the Senate Judiciary and Government Operations Committee;
JON RIKI KARAMATSU, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee;
JOSH GREEN, M.D., State Senator; and DENNY COFFMAN, State
Representative, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
s ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy,
and Recktenwald, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioner Andrew D. Woerner, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to
relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus
relief. ee HRS § 602-5(3) (2009) (“The supreme court shall have
jurisdiction and power [t]o exercise original jurisdiction
in all questions arising under writs of mandamus directed
to public officers to compel them to fulfill the duties of their
offices[.]);” In re. DisciplinarV Bd. Of the Hawaii Supreme
Court, 9l Hawai‘i 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (l999) (Mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual's claim is
clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so
plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy
is available.); Salling v. Moon, 76 HawaiU_273, 274 n. 3, 874 P.2d lO98, 1099 n.3 (l994) (“A duty is ministerial where the law
prescribes and defines the duty to be performed with such precision and certainty as to leave nothing to the exercise of discretion and judgment.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY OR_DERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, HawaiHq AuguSt 2, 2010_ w
tX@u¢m Ch“f\AJ
Wa¢~\_£. "0‘*@-€};()\'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woerner v. Bennett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woerner-v-bennett-haw-2010.