Woempener v. Ketchum

1 Mich. Pr. 8
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. Pr. 8 (Woempener v. Ketchum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woempener v. Ketchum, 1 Mich. Pr. 8 (Mich. 1896).

Opinion

Ketchum brought certiorari to justice’s judgment. He gave the usual bond. The judgment was affirmed, and proceedings thereon stayed for twenty days. During the life of the stay Ketchum sued out a writ of error, but filed supersedeas or other bond. After the expiration of the twenty days, and after return of the writ, and before the expiration of the thirty days within ■ which an execution must, under How. Stat. § 7029, have been issued in order to warrant its levy upon the property of surety, Woempener took out an execution, and caused it to be levied, upon the real estate of the surety. (Under Weiss v. Circuit Judge, 50 Mich. 158, said thirty days commences to run from and after the taxation .of. .costs) Ketchum moved in the Supreme Court for a writ of supersedeas to stay execution upon the circuit court judgment, ,aiid presented with the motion the usual sivpersedeas bond with two. sureties, each whom justified .in the penalty-of .the bond.. This showing was met by four affidavits as .to the , pecuniary irresponsibility of the proposed sureties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. Chambers
15 N.W. 63 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mich. Pr. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woempener-v-ketchum-mich-1896.