Woelfel v. Hammer
28 A. 146, 159 Pa. 446, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 863
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 15, 1894
DocketAppeal, No. 262
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 28 A. 146 (Woelfel v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woelfel v. Hammer, 28 A. 146, 159 Pa. 446, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 863 (Pa. 1894).
Opinion
The court below was right in refusing to open the judgment and let the defendants into a defence. The decree discharging the rule to show cause should therefore be affirmed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant, J. B. Hammer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co.
167 N.W.2d 724 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 A. 146, 159 Pa. 446, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woelfel-v-hammer-pa-1894.