Woe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.

130 N.E.3d 174, 482 Mass. 1108
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided July 31, 2019·Published

Opinion

The application is denied without prejudice, and the case is remanded to the Appeals Court for consideration in light of Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 496501 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 482 Mass. 643 (2019). On remand, the Appeals Court shall determine whether this case should be remanded to the hearing examiner for further factual findings as to (1) the degree of dangerousness posed by Doe, and (2) whether, given Doe's risk of reoffense and degree of dangerousness, a public safety interest will be served by Internet publication of Doe's sex offender registry information.

Appellate review denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 130 N.E.3d 174, 482 Mass. 1108 (Mass. 2019).

130 N.E.3d 174 (Woe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
126 N.E.3d 939 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2019)