Wo Kee & Co. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 312, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 259
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 6, 1948
DocketNo. 52310; protests 966583-G, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 312 (Wo Kee & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wo Kee & Co. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 312, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 259 (cusc 1948).

Opinion

[313]*313Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Fung Chong Co. (34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) apricot kernels the same as those involved in Abstract 34104 at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 762; and (3) Chinese drugs similar to those passed upon in Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 70 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Cust. Ct. 312, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wo-kee-co-v-united-states-cusc-1948.