Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets
This text of Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets (Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LORA JEAN WILLIAMS; GREGORY J. : No. 2 EM 2017 SMITH; CVP MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A : OR T/A CITY VIEW PIZZA; JOHN'S : ROAST PORK, INC. F/K/A JOHN'S : ROAST PORK; METRO BEVERAGE OF : PHILADELPHIA, INC. D/B/A OR T/A : METRO BEVERAGE; DAY'S : BEVERAGES, INC. D/B/A OR T/A DAY'S : BEVERAGES; AMERICAN BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; PENNSYLVANIA : BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION; : PHILADELPHIA BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; AND PENNSYLVANIA : FOOD MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND FRANK : BRESLIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS COMMISSIONER OF THE : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : REVENUE, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2017, the Application for Extraordinary
Relief is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wms-lora-v-city-of-phila-pets-pa-2017.