Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 13, 2017·No. Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets - No. 2 EM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

LORA JEAN WILLIAMS; GREGORY J. : No. 2 EM 2017 SMITH; CVP MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A : OR T/A CITY VIEW PIZZA; JOHN'S : ROAST PORK, INC. F/K/A JOHN'S : ROAST PORK; METRO BEVERAGE OF : PHILADELPHIA, INC. D/B/A OR T/A : METRO BEVERAGE; DAY'S : BEVERAGES, INC. D/B/A OR T/A DAY'S : BEVERAGES; AMERICAN BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; PENNSYLVANIA : BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION; : PHILADELPHIA BEVERAGE : ASSOCIATION; AND PENNSYLVANIA : FOOD MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, :

:

Respondents :

: :

v. :

: :

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND FRANK : BRESLIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS COMMISSIONER OF THE : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : REVENUE, :

:

Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2017, the Application for Extraordinary

Relief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets, (Pa. 2017).

Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets (Wms., Lora v. City of Phila., Pets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.