WM Specialty Mortgage LLC v. Azad

2016 NY Slip Op 7277, 144 A.D.3d 452, 39 N.Y.S.3d 794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 2016·No. 2144 381160/07·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered March 28, 2014, which denied defendant Azad’s motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and allow discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The 2010 and 2011 administrative orders on which defendant relies pertain only to foreclosure proceedings that were pending at the time of issuance and are therefore inapplicable to the subject judgment of foreclosure and sale, which was entered on or about January 13, 2009.

Defendant failed to set forth particular facts establishing the “fraud, collusion, mistake or accident” on which he bases his motion to vacate the judgment (see Matter of Callwood v Cabrera, 49 AD3d 394 [1st Dept 2008]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P, Renwick, Fein-man, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WM Specialty Mortgage LLC v. Azad, 2016 NY Slip Op 7277, 144 A.D.3d 452, 39 N.Y.S.3d 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7277 (WM Specialty Mortgage LLC v. Azad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callwood v. Cabrera
49 A.D.3d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)