Wm. Ryan & Sons v. Paine
This text of 66 Miss. 678 (Wm. Ryan & Sons v. Paine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A corollary from the legal propositions conceded by counsel for the appellees to be well established by authority, is that the complainants are entitled to impress a trust on so much of the assets of the bank in the hands of the receiver as consists of the debt from Honea incurred by his check on the bank for the sum due com[683]*683plainants, and the decree should have been in their favor to that extent.
Reversed and remanded.
Afterward R. E. Houston and Olifton & Eehford, for appellees, filed a suggestion or error, which was
Overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Miss. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wm-ryan-sons-v-paine-miss-1889.