Wm. Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Rogers

95 F. 1007, 37 C.C.A. 358, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 30, 1899·No. No. 31·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

FEU CURIAM.

Order denying preliminary injunction is affirmed, with costs. 84 Fed. 639. AVALLACE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the opinion of the court below, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wm. Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Rogers, 95 F. 1007, 37 C.C.A. 358, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504 (2d Cir. 1899).

95 F. 1007 (Wm. Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Trading Co. v. H. E. Heacock Co.
285 U.S. 247 (Supreme Court, 1932)
The Western Star
157 F. 489 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1907)
Wm. A. Rogers, Ltd. v. International Silver Co.
30 App. D.C. 97 (D.C. Circuit, 1907)