WM. H. Frank Brewing Co. v. Mayor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

WM. H. Frank Brewing Co. v. Mayor

46 N.Y.S. 24, 19 A.D. 628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 46 N.Y.S. 24 (WM. H. Frank Brewing Co. v. Mayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WM. H. Frank Brewing Co. v. Mayor, 46 N.Y.S. 24, 19 A.D. 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It seems to us.that the plaintiff was entitled to-the costs which had accrued prior to the time of granting the motion for consolidation. The order consolidating the actions should therefore have given to the plaintiff the right to tax such costs in each action as had accrued up to the -time of the malting of the motion.

The order should therefore be reversed, without costs, and the motion for consolidation granted, as above stated, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It seems to us.that the plaintiff was entitled to-the costs which had accrued prior to the time of granting the motion for consolidation. The order consolidating the actions should therefore have given to the plaintiff the right to tax such costs in each action as had accrued up to the -time of the malting of the motion.

The order should therefore be reversed, without costs, and the motion for consolidation granted, as above stated, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.Y.S. 24, 19 A.D. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wm-h-frank-brewing-co-v-mayor-nyappdiv-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack