Wm. H. Brown & Bro. Co. of New York, Inc. v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wm. H. Brown & Bro. Co. of New York, Inc. v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.

10 Misc. 2d 33, 6 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1206

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 Misc. 2d 33 (Wm. H. Brown & Bro. Co. of New York, Inc. v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wm. H. Brown & Bro. Co. of New York, Inc. v. Chase Brass & Copper Co., 10 Misc. 2d 33, 6 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is clear that the defendant through its salesman had oral notice of the contract of resale and that no other product but the defendant’s was available. Such evidence is sufficient to hold the defendant liable for special damages. (Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. Federal Sugar Refining Co., 255 N. Y. 33, 44.) The salesman had apparent authority to do everything necessary to consummate the contract and notice to him was notice to the defendant.

[34]*34The judgment insofar as appealed from should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, and the case remanded to the court below for the purpose of assessing damages.

Frankenthaler, Shientag and Noonan, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI