Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer

Supreme Court of Florida

Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer

192 So. 402, 140 Fla. 841, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1212

DecidedDecember 5, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 402 (Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wm. G. Roe & Co. v. Archer, 192 So. 402, 140 Fla. 841, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1212 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

The only question presented in this case is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. An examination of the record convinces us there was no reversible error; therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam. —

The only question presented in this case is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. An examination of the record convinces us there was no reversible error; therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 402, 140 Fla. 841, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wm-g-roe-co-v-archer-fla-1939.