Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour

Appellate Court of Illinois

Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour

185 Ill. App. 325

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided March 9, 1914·No. Gen. No. 18,761·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 983*—when error in refusing to dismiss not reviewable. Error in refusing to dismiss a cause for failure to prove that plaintiff was a corporation is not reviewable where no motion therefor appears in the record. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 956*—what not reviewable on striking of statement of facts. Where the statement of facts was stricken from the record, the denial of a motion to dismiss for want of proof that plaintiff was a corporation cannot he reviewed, since it would be impossible to conclude that the court ruled, incorrectly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 983*—when error in refusing to dismiss not reviewable. Error in refusing to dismiss a cause for failure to prove that plaintiff was a corporation is not reviewable where no motion therefor appears in the record. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 956*—what not reviewable on striking of statement of facts. Where the statement of facts was stricken from the record, the denial of a motion to dismiss for want of proof that plaintiff was a corporation cannot he reviewed, since it would be impossible to conclude that the court ruled, incorrectly.

Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour, 185 Ill. App. 325 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

185 Ill. App. 325 (Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.