Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour

Appellate Court of Illinois

Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour

185 Ill. App. 325

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 9, 1914

DocketGen. No. 18,761

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ill. App. 325 (Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wm. Doerflinger Co. v. Seymour, 185 Ill. App. 325 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 983*—when error in refusing to dismiss not reviewable. Error in refusing to dismiss a cause for failure to prove that plaintiff was a corporation is not reviewable where no motion therefor appears in the record. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 956*—what not reviewable on striking of statement of facts. Where the statement of facts was stricken from the record, the denial of a motion to dismiss for want of proof that plaintiff was a corporation cannot he reviewed, since it would be impossible to conclude that the court ruled, incorrectly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 983*—when error in refusing to dismiss not reviewable. Error in refusing to dismiss a cause for failure to prove that plaintiff was a corporation is not reviewable where no motion therefor appears in the record. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 956*—what not reviewable on striking of statement of facts. Where the statement of facts was stricken from the record, the denial of a motion to dismiss for want of proof that plaintiff was a corporation cannot he reviewed, since it would be impossible to conclude that the court ruled, incorrectly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Ill. App. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wm-doerflinger-co-v-seymour-illappct-1914.